News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Developer won’t get hit by a bus, they’ll get hired by Ne... by JoshTriplett on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @01:53PM (#24123423)
Equating the two creates a perception that employees shouldn't be paid as much as they're worth. An employee being paid $500k/year is probably producing even more value to their employer than that, and if anything, the goal should be to close the gap between value and compensation, not widen it.
Re:Developer won’t get hit by a bus, they’ll get hired by Ne... by Cederfjard on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @02:18PM (#24123741)
I think the point is that very wealthy companies can temporarily pay employees more than the value they provide, and willingly eat that cost until the competition has been stifled, at which point they can lower compensation again.
Re:Developer won’t get hit by a bus, they’ll get hired by Ne... by jefftk on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @02:21PM (#24123796)
On the other hand, offering extremely high salaries makes a lot of people consider becoming programmers who wouldn't otherwise think of it. You can't buy your way out of having your competitors having access to skilled labor, outside of perhaps the very short-term.
Re:Developer won’t get hit by a bus, they’ll get hired by Ne... by saalweachter on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @02:30PM (#24123949)
Yeah, this is the housing problem all over again. If the price to buy (well, rent) an engineer is too high, build more engineers.
Re:Developer won’t get hit by a bus, they’ll get hired by Ne... by thesuitonym on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @02:31PM (#24123962)
>is probably producing even more value to their employer than that

That's the crux of the argument, though. Google can afford to take a loss on the employee's salary for years, just to keep them from a competitor. We're not talking about Google arbitrarily paying a developer more than their competitors, we're talking about Google diverting funds from other business units to cover costs.