Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by fastball on Monday August 10, 2020 @08:53PM
(#24116085)
Why not?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by ummonk on Monday August 10, 2020 @10:03PM
(#24116481)
It's equivalent to submitting a lower bid.
(The point is moot though because apparently Uber rolled out a feature that allows drivers in California to set their rates).
Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by fastball on Monday August 10, 2020 @10:07PM
(#24116504)
A town wants a bridge built. They set a maximum price. Three contractors submits bids. They are all at the maximum price – instead the contractors differentiate themselves based on quality of previous work and distance to the construction site.
A fourth contractor thinks the price is too little and rejects it outright.
The fourth contractor has "submitted a lower bid"?
Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by ummonk on Monday August 10, 2020 @10:13PM
(#24116540)
The fourth contractor submits a bid above the minimum price.
Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by fastball on Monday August 10, 2020 @10:21PM
(#24116575)
Yes, sorry, I misspoke (edit: actually, I think you misspoke in your previous comment, and then I copied the mistake).
But no, the fourth contractor did not submit a bid at a higher price. They did not submit a bid at all.
Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by ummonk on Monday August 10, 2020 @10:48PM
(#24116702)
Ah yes, indeed I did.
I see your point too. Essentially, rather than contractors proposing prices and then clients accepting or moving on, if clients propose prices and then contractors accept or move on, it's still a market with negotiated rates.