Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by gok on Monday August 10, 2020 @08:44PM
(#24116025)
Would it be better if I called it a "misconception" perhaps? If it matters, I meant it in the "idea that spreads between people" sense, not the animal-gif-with-block-text sense.
Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by Karunamon on Monday August 10, 2020 @07:50PM
(#24115618)
People are deserving of respect, arguments less so. I see no reason to grant any particular deference to a sentence.
Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by JMTQp8lwXL on Monday August 10, 2020 @07:57PM
(#24115687)
Saying an argument is false because it's a meme isn't a rational way to argue against a thought. You argue against things with facts and evidence. It's more disrespectful of the opposition if that's the strongest remark the opposition can make.
I suppose the great-grandparent is more an 'appeal to emotion' fallacy rather than ad hominem.
Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by closeparen on Monday August 10, 2020 @09:12PM
(#24116212)
The word "meme" isn't doing any argumentative work here. It's just a handle for the claim that's being contested, with some extra connotation that the claim is typical or customary rather than unique to this thread.
https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7512/15985103560_ed7985fc2a_o...