News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GraalVM by gunnarmorling on Monday August 10, 2020 @02:15PM (#24112268)
Agreed that the experience when trying to native-enable existing libs isn't the greatest. Altough those things are rather reported by the GraalVM compiler rather than Quarkus. The working model and assumption is that somebody goes through this once and then either contributes changes to the library in question back upstream or provides a Quarkus extension for that library, sparing others from that hassle.

That RAM consumption sounds definitely over the top; if you still have the context, logging an issue would be very welcomed. That said, there's many libraries enabled by Quarkus (see quarkus.io/guides/), so every essential functionality should be covered by now. Still a question of course whether your specific library in a given space (like FreeMarker vs. Quarkus Qute) already is supported. In any case, thanks for checking back in regularly, things might look better next time already, as the framework evolves rapidly.

Re:GraalVM by vips7L on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @10:58AM (#24120955)
Isn't native-image memory consumption and compile time basically a known issue by the graal team?