Re:Dorking: the use of search engines to find very specific ...
by jon_richards on Sunday August 09, 2020 @07:08PM
(#24103721)
I think it’s primarily for people copying and pasting something like an error message, which may have user-specific data in quotes. That should be what “not many results for...” is for, but Google is always trying to optimize away those clicks. Maybe they could add a “programatic” search feature with documented syntax for power users.
Re:Dorking: the use of search engines to find very specific ...
by hwillis on Sunday August 09, 2020 @08:58PM
(#24104378)
A moderate-length string of quoted words (>5?) used to return zero or near zero results and a suggestion to try without quotes- imo ideal
Re:Dorking: the use of search engines to find very specific ...
by echelon on Monday August 10, 2020 @10:05AM
(#24109351)
Power users aren't where the money is.
Re:Dorking: the use of search engines to find very specific ...
by mcswell on Sunday August 09, 2020 @11:37PM
(#24105250)
Maybe they should go back to +
Re:Dorking: the use of search engines to find very specific ...
by hoseja on Monday August 10, 2020 @08:31AM
(#24108536)
Add? They used to have one and actively removed it.
Re:Dorking: the use of search engines to find very specific ...
by rozab on Monday August 10, 2020 @11:28AM
(#24110327)
I am always surprised that these systems are not more friendly to engineers, since they were built by them. You'd think for their own sakes they'd stick in a system like xkcd.com/806/
Re:Dorking: the use of search engines to find very specific ...
by bbarnett on Monday August 10, 2020 @05:27PM
(#24114185)
Use 'verbatim'. It's a drop down option, and it isn't as good as the old + or other operators (deprecated because of Google Plus). For example, with verbatim you can't only + one single thing in a search.
Regardless, I basically just always search with verbatim on. Google is mostly useless otherwise.
Re:Dorking: the use of search engines to find very specific ...
by librarianscott on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @05:16PM
(#24126077)
Thank you. I quickly changed my default Chrome search to https://www.google.com/search?q=%s&tbs=li:1 instead of regular Google
But bejesus, this drives me nuts! If I know the double quotes function even exists, then Google should know I actually want to use it as intended - it shouldn't decide "yeah, but maybe you'd like these irrelevant results too!"