News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:5G Just Got Weird by mattlondon on Sunday August 09, 2020 @04:11PM (#24102475)
Is it realistic to expect 5G coverage in rural wetlands?

From what I understand, the range of a single 5G base station is significantly lower than 2/3/4G so they are having to install new cell sites in major towns and cities just for 5G coverage.

Re:5G Just Got Weird by Shelnutt2 on Sunday August 09, 2020 @04:37PM (#24102667)
Millimeter wave frequencies are just one aspect of "5G", the standard of 3GPP Release 15 (and newer) are improvements and build off the existing standards of LTE (releases 8-14). Its quite possible, and likely that "5G" will be deployed across all existing spectrum, including lower frequency. Much like LTE has been and continues to be deployed across existing spectrum that was 2G/3G.

The focus on millimeter wave is large part due to existing capacity problems in high density areas, or for high bandwidth applications.

Re:5G Just Got Weird by Foivos on Sunday August 09, 2020 @04:30PM (#24102606)
There are technologies belonging to the 5G family that target specifically IoT. They can coexist with “normal” 5G /4G in the same base station. These technologies have way more robust transmission schemes that make them operational even with 20db (100 times) worse SNR than normal mobile communications technologies like LTE. The flagship technology in this space proposed by 3GPP is NB-IoT.
Re:5G Just Got Weird by squarefoot on Sunday August 09, 2020 @06:53PM (#24103646)
Probably since electronics has become so miniaturized and cheap, thinking of one cell per building or even one cell per light pole, wouldn't be that odd.