News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rome: A Linter for JavaScript and TypeScript by fastball on Sunday August 09, 2020 @06:28AM (#24098602)
Honestly, I think your thinking is totally backwards.

Wanting a project to be successful because of the person who started it is a terrible reason and has had (unsurprisingly) terrible results wherever I've seen it in the OSS community.

I feel the exact opposite: things like Rome (and Deno) are exactly the kind of projects that are needed in order to sort out a horribly fractured eco-system. I don't care who built them as long as they work well to solve the problems that so clearly exist.

Re:Rome: A Linter for JavaScript and TypeScript by mcny on Sunday August 09, 2020 @06:39AM (#24098664)
> Wanting a project to be successful because of the person who started it is a terrible reason and has had (unsurprisingly) terrible results wherever I've seen it in the OSS community.

I somehow misinterpreted pipenv being an official python project. My usecase was pretty simple, I wanted a requirements.txt that only included the things I explicitly installed with perhaps a requirements-lock.txt with the actual list of things installed. :/

I didn’t even realize poetry existed until I talked to people who do python full time.

Re:Rome: A Linter for JavaScript and TypeScript by fastball on Sunday August 09, 2020 @07:17AM (#24098842)
Yeah, that is an example that sprang to mind as soon as I read the GC.