Re:Snapdragon chip flaws put 1B Android phones at risk of da...
by judge2020 on Saturday August 08, 2020 @10:39PM
(#24096859)
> Easy enough for grandma, maybe not so much.
This is pretty important when we're taking about a billion devices. The amount of people who do this is irrelevant and thus 99% or more of these users will be vulnerable until their phone stops working or the Facebook app no longer supports such an old version, forcing them to get a new one [assuming new Snapdragon chips fix the issue].
Re:Snapdragon chip flaws put 1B Android phones at risk of da...
by post_below on Sunday August 09, 2020 @05:36AM
(#24098409)
Right I never suggested otherwise, just clearing up the misconception that a locked bootloader automatically means the phone's OS can't be updated.
Re:Snapdragon chip flaws put 1B Android phones at risk of da...
by TheSpiceIsLife on Sunday August 09, 2020 @03:14AM
(#24097946)
How do you keep a straight face and say something like “security updates are possible as soon as someone discovers an exploit”?
Deary me.
Re:Snapdragon chip flaws put 1B Android phones at risk of da...
by post_below on Sunday August 09, 2020 @05:34AM
(#24098404)
The exploits in question generally require having the device in your possession and unlocking it.
I think the distinction is pretty clear.
Re:Snapdragon chip flaws put 1B Android phones at risk of da...
by TheSpiceIsLife on Sunday August 09, 2020 @10:51AM
(#24099982)
Exploits, plural.
Kinda proves my point: chain of exploits.
Easy enough for grandma, maybe not so much.