News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Auden on No-Platforming Pound (2019) by pdonis on Friday August 07, 2020 @07:46PM (#24087633)
> It's for those of us who sympathize with the cancelled to create spaces where they can continue to thrive.

But what if cancel culture doesn't let you? What if the very act of having any sympathy at all with the cancelled, let alone creating spaces where they can continue to thrive, marks you out for cancellation as well?

To put this into the context of the Cerf-Auden exchange, what if Cerf, on finding that Auden "sympathized" with the cancelled Pound, had not responded as he did, but instead had tried to get other publishers to refuse to publish Auden's work? Or had hired some private investigators to get some dirt on Auden? Or had, by devious routes, gotten someone to form a mob of rioters and vandalize Auden's house? Those things seem a lot more like what "cancel culture" is these days.

Re:Auden on No-Platforming Pound (2019) by renewiltord on Friday August 07, 2020 @07:49PM (#24087658)
I'm okay with that. I don't want the law to force you to like me. You don't have to like me. You don't have to hire me. You don't have to buy from me. You _do_ have to sell to me. Any action you take to distance yourself from me, you have a right to do. You also have a right to be honest about your reasons. You can't libel me, but if what you don't like about me is that I like Python 3, then go ahead.

The era of the Internet means that so many things are marginal cost. Now, refusal to carry just means they can go somewhere else. This is going to expand. Decentralization means power to the common man.