In the Netherlands, 0.6% of the reported hospitalisations involved children under the age of 18, and 0 death have been reported under this age. Here's the summary page of the RIVM: https://www.rivm.nl/en/novel-coronavirus-covid-19/children-a...
Some googling reveals only corroborating reports that the case fatality (CFR) rate among young children is very low:
https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/sites/know4pol/files/j...
https://ourworldindata.org/mortality-risk-covid#case-fatalit...
https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/ncov/ep...
AFAICT if you just try to synthesize the existing research without prejudice, you'd have to conclude that the risk of young children dying from COVID-19 is very low.
Whether there is much risk of children -> adult transmission is more difficult to answer.
Kids require adults to take care of them. That means those kids who may have the infection could VERY easily spread it to higher risk people.
They aren't immune, they still get the virus, they can still spread it. That is not immune. They just don't show symptoms like older people. That's not an immunity.
On top of that we don't know the long term effects of this thing. While kids may not show symptoms what long term effects might this have on kids? There's still a huge risk there.
It means a lot, its a good news, it means the virus is not that dangerous.
>On top of that we don't know the long term effects of this thing
Sure but there also long term effect of kids not going to school in person, that is bigger risk.
If you are really really that paranoid, you can home school your kids.
I never claimed they are, so I don't know what you're actually replying to here.
That might be true to a degree, however the discrepancy is so huge, 2-3 orders of magnitude, that it should be pretty clear kids really do have much less to fear. I think some Olympic-level contortionism is needed to come to any other conclusion.
I'm hoping that's not the dominant factor in the numbers, because school re-opening will be real ugly if it is.