Re:Scientists rename human genes to stop MS Excel from misre...
by kergonath on Friday August 07, 2020 @04:49PM
(#24086309)
For fuck’s sake. It’s simple, really:
- DMY is much more popular than MDY, in almost all of Europe, Africa, South America, and in large parts of Asia.
- DM is a common short form of DMY when the year is not ambiguous
=> I highly doubt your assertion that MD is more popular than DM, and in fact I am certain that 1 February is a much more common way of parsing 01/02 than 2 January.
Note that none of these points require the absence of any other way of writing dates. You could indeed argue, preferably with examples and not hypotheticals, that some locales exist in which MD would be the natural way, and that they outweigh the others.
Now you can move the goalposts once more if you really need to. It really is tedious.
You did indeed. How else could you interpret this exchange?
>>> "01/02" does not translate to Jan 2nd in most of the world, because DMY is much more popular than MDY.
>> There's no year in 01/02. MD is more popular than DM.
> In which country do people use DMY, but also MD?
The only way to have that question make any sense at all is to assume that MDY and DMY are the only options. That certainly is ridiculous, but I'm not the one who said it.