You are using an argument style of the sort “there is a good reason to do this, and a bad thing that will happen if we don’t do this.” It’s flaw is that it ignores the bigger picture and competing interests, where we find there are other competing good and bad things to think about.

If you imagine a world where crime is truly impossible, it is a world where humans are utterly incapable of disobeying the government under any desperate or impassioned circumstance