News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:American darknet vendor and Costa Rican pharmacist charged by ithkuil on Thursday August 06, 2020 @04:20AM (#24069073)
> and they returned home to a country where the drug was illegal.

They also returned to their families and loved ones, trying re-introduce themselves to civil society and many figured out that heroin was not helping (illegal or not)

Re:American darknet vendor and Costa Rican pharmacist charged by remarkEon on Thursday August 06, 2020 @04:24AM (#24069098)
You (and others in this thread) are helping to make my point for me, which is that personal social structures are paramount for killing drug addiction.
Re:American darknet vendor and Costa Rican pharmacist charged by ethanbond on Thursday August 06, 2020 @06:39AM (#24069718)
I don’t think anyone is disputing that some variation of this idea is true. What’s not being stated explicitly is that if it’s true that social connectedness (ambiguously including identity, purpose, etc.) matters, then it’s also true that our current enforcement mechanisms are probably incredibly counterproductive.

Everyone gets the point you’re making, you’re just not following it through to something meaningful and instead supposing it implies something it doesn’t.

Re:American darknet vendor and Costa Rican pharmacist charged by Fjolsvith on Thursday August 06, 2020 @09:39AM (#24070752)
And... that ties nicely in with the defund the police narrative.
Re:American darknet vendor and Costa Rican pharmacist charged by arcticbull on Thursday August 06, 2020 @05:40PM (#24075756)
This has nothing to do with the "defund the police" narrative, Portugal did this 20 years ago.
Re:American darknet vendor and Costa Rican pharmacist charged by Fjolsvith on Friday August 07, 2020 @11:39AM (#24083040)
> then it’s also true that our current enforcement mechanisms are probably incredibly counterproductive.

Fits nicely to me.

Re:American darknet vendor and Costa Rican pharmacist charged by arcticbull on Friday August 07, 2020 @01:09PM (#24084198)
Ah, I see what you meant, I read it as implying that the "defund the police" people were driving the narrative I was referencing, not that the narrative I was referencing happened to fit the "defund the police" one.