News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Paul Graham is wrong about New York City by pg on Tuesday July 08, 2008 @10:10PM (#240659)
"Ultimately power rests with the founders. A startup with the best people will beat one with funding from famous VCs, and a startup that was sufficiently successful would never have to move. So a town that could exert enough pull over the right people could resist and perhaps even surpass Silicon Valley."

http://www.paulgraham.com/siliconvalley.html

Re:Why Paul Graham is wrong about New York City by giles_bowkett on Wednesday July 09, 2008 @07:47AM (#241019)
Yes. Because it's about which town is number one. It's not about the fact that any town can produce great tech today, with or without startups.

Nor is it about the fact that today's abundance of great free tech enables many towns to simultaneously produce work of top quality, making the whole concept of "number one" meaningless.

Nor is it about the fact that so many towns and non-towns can produce great tech that towns become irrelevant too.

Actually, by yes, I mean no.

I think I've read nearly everything you've published. I was aware of the quote when I wrote the criticism, and I think the quote fails to address any substantive part of it. I think if you want to address any criticism I make, you'll need to write something new, or dig up something obscure which I haven't read.