Re:Conventions for Command Line Options
by chriswarbo on Monday August 03, 2020 @06:10AM
(#24035950)
Config files introduce a whole slew of complexity: race conditions, a whole bunch of new error conditions (permission denied, parse errors, read-only filesystems, disk full, etc.); system- or user-wide config files are spooky action-at-a-distance, which can make problems hard to track down, makes commands non-deterministic and may impact reproducibility (e.g. on other people's machines).
If commands insist on taking options via a config file, my preferred way to call them is to generate the config in-place via process substitution, e.g.
If commands insist on taking options via a config file, my preferred way to call them is to generate the config in-place via process substitution, e.g.
Although this isn't always possible, e.g. if 'someCommand' tries seeking around the config file rather than just parsing it in one pass.