News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AstraZeneca exempt from coronavirus vaccine liability cla... by ponker on Saturday August 01, 2020 @09:26PM (#24025516)
Just taking a hard pass on all pharmaceuticals developed in the last 20 years is not a highly optimized strategy.
Re:AstraZeneca exempt from coronavirus vaccine liability cla... by Alex3917 on Saturday August 01, 2020 @10:31PM (#24025846)
I mean if you are going to potentially die otherwise then that's one thing. But if you go to the doctor with a sore throat and they hand you some random script for something you've never heard of, hard pass is a pretty good strategy.

The appropriate way to make medical decisions is based on data, but if a drug is still under patent then the data isn't there.

Re:AstraZeneca exempt from coronavirus vaccine liability cla... by ChrisLomont on Sunday August 02, 2020 @08:56AM (#24028420)
So the day a patent expires the data suddenly appears?
Re:AstraZeneca exempt from coronavirus vaccine liability cla... by new2628 on Sunday August 02, 2020 @03:23AM (#24027012)
You are right, 50 years is probably smarter, 20 is too little for all the effects to come out.
Re:AstraZeneca exempt from coronavirus vaccine liability cla... by ponker on Sunday August 02, 2020 @11:11PM (#24033861)
yep... waiting until 2010 to get vaccinated against measles definitely says “high IQ”
Re:AstraZeneca exempt from coronavirus vaccine liability cla... by new2628 on Monday August 03, 2020 @03:14AM (#24034952)
Being an "early adopter" when it comes to non-essential medicine is not too smart either.

Referring to IQ as a stand-in for intelligence is yet another blind alley.