News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The semver trick (2019) by yjftsjthsd-h on Saturday August 01, 2020 @05:52PM (#24024201)
> Inside a company and especially in a monorepo, someone - probably the person making the breaking change - would have just upgraded everyone at once.

Ideally yes, in practice not always. The easy way to break it is of course political problems, but it's perfectly possible to be stuck in a situation where unfortunate design decisions early on leave you stuck unable to make breaking changes even if everyone is on the same side (at any rate, not without taking a massive service disruption that would violate our contracts with customers).

Re:The semver trick (2019) by samus on Sunday August 09, 2020 @01:12PM (#24101061)
At work we had that situation with Spring. In the far future, we would like to upgrade to Java > 8, which makes an upgrade to Spring 5 necessary. But the frontend module uses Spring Flow Portlets, which are deprecated and were removed in Spring 5. This was not really a concern though, until too many security issues were found that made the upgrade necessary. In the end we settled on leaving the frontend on Spring 4 and upgrading everything else. It is very ugly, but the only real issue so far is that Spring 4 cannot parse Spring MVC 5's REST encoding of exceptions. Fortunately, we will build a new frontend this year...