Re:The Case Against OOP Is Wildly Overstated
by throwaway894345 on Friday July 31, 2020 @01:15PM
(#24010895)
I understand the differences between homoiconicity and first class functions and even that modern languages often support them, but that support is typically an artifact of a functional (and not OOP) influence with the exception of function pointers in C whose origins im not sure about except that it doesn’t come from OOP. The point is that despite the confusion about “what does OOP mean, really”, there are no prominent arguments that suggest that homoiconicity or first class functions are defining characteristics.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.