Anti-climate action statements get more visibility in news coverage, study finds

Re:Anti-climate action statements get more visibility in new... by marcosdumay on Thursday July 30, 2020 @02:38PM (#24001513)

Every one in academia working towards proving that climate change is real is also working towards proving it's not real.

In fact, if you go into it with a pre-conceived bias that disagrees with everything everybody else has seen, you'll be laughed out of it. You should be laughed out of it too if your bias aligned with what everybody else has seen.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anti-climate action statements get more visibility in new... by cameronbrown on Thursday July 30, 2020 @10:18PM (#24005044)

Agree in theory, but alas, not in practice. Nobody's going to get funding for disproving/attacking climate theories.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anti-climate action statements get more visibility in new... by adrianN on Friday July 31, 2020 @01:19AM (#24005920)

But everyone is getting funding for collecting new and looking at existing data and thinking of new ways to validate that our climate models can be trusted. If they happen to find evidence that disagrees with the established theory they're in great luck because surprising results get published whereas confirming what we know lands in third tier journals.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anti-climate action statements get more visibility in new... by cameronbrown on Tuesday August 04, 2020 @07:29AM (#24048850)

Just having the mindset of "we need to validate this" isn't enough. Having the mindset of trying to disprove a theory encourages people to look in new areas. Diversity of thought is important because a monoculture stalls innovation and creativity.

[ Parent | on HN ]