News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anti-climate action statements get more visibility in new... by reaperducer on Thursday July 30, 2020 @11:13AM (#23999109)
news organizations often mislead readers by giving equal weight to two sides of an argument, even when one side isn’t as widely believed or lacks scientific evidence.

News organizations used to filter out the cranks. Some still do, but more have buckled to the pressure to shove out metric assloads of low-quality content in order to satiate people who only get their news by scrolling. (It's called "feeding the beast.")

And those that still do filter out the low-quality garbage are attacked on social media for being left-wing or right-wing, or whatever wing the social media megaphones decide is bad at that particular nanosecond.

Re:Anti-climate action statements get more visibility in new... by VBprogrammer on Thursday July 30, 2020 @11:30AM (#23999312)
When heads of state of Western nations are pushing the crank theories it's hard to blame the media for not filtering them.