News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brown M&Ms, or Why No One Reads the Manual by ghaff on Thursday July 30, 2020 @08:23AM (#23997256)
I agree although in some circumstances, contracting for your former employer may be violating your employment agreement with your current one.
Re:Brown M&Ms, or Why No One Reads the Manual by mytailorisrich on Thursday July 30, 2020 @08:41AM (#23997399)
That does not mean that you should do it for free (which might still be a contractual breach, btw).
Re:Brown M&Ms, or Why No One Reads the Manual by ghaff on Thursday July 30, 2020 @08:49AM (#23997474)
Theoretically maybe. In practice, no one to a first approximation is going to have an issue with you spending an hour helping a prior employer with some cleanup related to your prior job. Employment agreements tend to use words like outside employment/consulting/etc. They don't (and it would probably be unenforceable if they did) generally forbid you from talking to a former employer.
Re:Brown M&Ms, or Why No One Reads the Manual by frobozz on Thursday July 30, 2020 @05:06PM (#24002839)
In some circumstances, it may even be violating your termination agreement with the former one.

Often, if made redundant by a company, you cannot return to work for them (as employee or contractor) for a year, otherwise you have to pay back your redundancy pay.

That leads to a potentially hilarious conversation about rates.

"I'll do it, my rates are 100 per hour plus 10K if you want me to start before June next year"

Re:Brown M&Ms, or Why No One Reads the Manual by mytailorisrich on Thursday July 30, 2020 @05:43PM (#24003187)
If that's a contractual obligation between them and you they just need to waive it in writing so that you're protected.

That being said, the issue with redundancy packages is that taxes are involved and those guys will be inflexible if they find out that your package turns out not to be tax-free after all.