News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Teaching GPT-3 to Identify Nonsense by IggleSniggle on Wednesday July 29, 2020 @08:53PM (#23993222)
Yeah exactly people do the same thing. There's good evidence that for the most part, our actions are driven by our "non-sentient" mind, and our sentient brain just decides justifications to explain a cohesive story as it goes along after it happens.

"Why did you do that?" -> attempt to make up an answer that will be believable both to self-identity and to the listener.

So what's the point of the executive mind if the hindbrain is doing all the walking and talking?

The primary benefit of this story-making is that it allows formulating predictions and discarding the least probable. When a believable prediction kicks in, the predictive brain incentivizes the hindbrain with a partial taste of any reward or pain, with promises of more should the path transpire.

Disclaimer: not a neuroscientist, just a lifelong enthusiast of the subject.

Re:Teaching GPT-3 to Identify Nonsense by ZephyrBlu on Wednesday July 29, 2020 @08:59PM (#23993253)
This is very believable. Post-rationalization just makes sense. Even if you come up with a shitty reason, at least you have _a_ reason for doing something.
Re:Teaching GPT-3 to Identify Nonsense by inakarmacoma on Thursday July 30, 2020 @12:39AM (#23994736)
Your comment is an example of itself.
Re:Teaching GPT-3 to Identify Nonsense by red75prime on Thursday July 30, 2020 @11:55PM (#24005488)
Situations, where you don't make cohesive story, but stop and think "What the hell I'm doing?", aren't uncommon either.