This is very believable. Post-rationalization just makes sense. Even if you come up with a shitty reason, at least you have _a_ reason for doing something.
Re:Teaching GPT-3 to Identify Nonsense
by inakarmacoma on Thursday July 30, 2020 @12:39AM
(#23994736)
Your comment is an example of itself.
Re:Teaching GPT-3 to Identify Nonsense
by red75prime on Thursday July 30, 2020 @11:55PM
(#24005488)
Situations, where you don't make cohesive story, but stop and think "What the hell I'm doing?", aren't uncommon either.
"Why did you do that?" -> attempt to make up an answer that will be believable both to self-identity and to the listener.
So what's the point of the executive mind if the hindbrain is doing all the walking and talking?
The primary benefit of this story-making is that it allows formulating predictions and discarding the least probable. When a believable prediction kicks in, the predictive brain incentivizes the hindbrain with a partial taste of any reward or pain, with promises of more should the path transpire.
Disclaimer: not a neuroscientist, just a lifelong enthusiast of the subject.