Dick Tracy wrist radio (and Star Trek communicator) notwithstanding, fiction didn't really broadly embrace ubiquitous communications. I suspect part of the reason is that, as the article notes, a lot of fiction uses control of information flows as an important part of plot construction.
And, as you note, video phones were pretty universally envisioned as landline plus screen. As with many things, video has of course evolved much more organically. Initially primarily on mobile and, of course, it's exploded on notebooks/desktops in the current situation.
Re:An Elegy for the Landline in Literature
by at-fates-hands on Wednesday July 29, 2020 @11:41AM
(#23987899)
I have a 1986 Playboy and in the "Tech Section" there is a image of a "video phone" which was basically a landline phone setup with a tiny 5" B&W screen with an image of the person you were talking to and it was hailed as the future of communications.
Behold, the Luma Telecom Video Telephone:
Looks like a press release from 1986: https://www.upi.com/Archives/1986/04/22/Luma-Telecom-Inc-has...
If you wanted some pics: https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/vintage-mitsubishi-lu...
Re:An Elegy for the Landline in Literature
by rsynnott on Wednesday July 29, 2020 @11:47AM
(#23988004)
Even weirder, things like this were still being marketed this century: https://www.theregister.com/2004/09/15/amstrad_e3_launch/
Well, that was 3 years before the launch of the iPhone. It totally made sense at that time.
There was a picturephone booth demonstration at the 1964 world's fair: https://ethw.org/Picturephone
Some of this was probably deliberate; the show depicted computer consoles with ancient purely-mechanical typewriters. But still, I interpret the tagline "Twenty minutes into the future" as something of a disclaimer.