News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel ousts its chief engineer, shakes up technical group... by quotemstr on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @12:46AM (#23972362)
Yes. Intel's failure demonstrates that the US no longer knows how to make chips as good as those of our geopolitical rivals. We're kept safe in large part by our technological edge. If we start falling behind in technology, it's not just a bad decade for Intel, but a hole in national security.
Re:Intel ousts its chief engineer, shakes up technical group... by Symmetry on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @07:20AM (#23974528)
Taiwan and South Korea are hardly our geopolitical rivals.
Re:Intel ousts its chief engineer, shakes up technical group... by quotemstr on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @09:29AM (#23975517)
Oh, come on. We both know that in a war, our main geopolitical rival would conquer both on turn 1.
Re:Intel ousts its chief engineer, shakes up technical group... by Symmetry on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @10:30AM (#23976169)
We really don't. Naval invasions are hard, particularly when the US is the world's dominant sea power. Theoretically China could invade South Korea through North Korea but North Korea wouldn't like that and they have nukes. But conquest of them is what happens when WWIII cooks off - we were talking about geopolitical rivalry.
Re:Intel ousts its chief engineer, shakes up technical group... by quotemstr on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @01:04PM (#23978004)
Even if China can't invade Taiwan right away, China can set up a naval and air blockade. And if they can't do that, they can destroy the very delicate fabs using short-range conventional missiles. China is a high-tech peer adversary, not a bunch of desert guys in pickup trucks. As a matter of national security, we need a secure (and E2E-trusted!) supply chain for advanced technology.