News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Are we in an AI Overhang? by saddlerustle on Monday July 27, 2020 @02:30PM (#23967956)
Who cares how much power it needs? Plug it into a hydroelectric dam. A superhuman AI would surely provide higher ROI than the terrawatts used for smelting Aluminium.
Re:Are we in an AI Overhang? by hyperbovine on Monday July 27, 2020 @02:39PM (#23968043)
You're missing my point. If it's possible to achieve general AI with incredibly minimal computational requirements, then this implies that current methods which rely on some sort of teraflop arms race to achieve better results are based on a fundamentally flawed model.
Re:Are we in an AI Overhang? by postnihilism on Monday July 27, 2020 @08:39PM (#23971043)
General intelligence in its biological form was achieved with hundreds of millions of years evolution, which required the "evaluation" of trillions and trillions of instantiations of nervous systems. The total energy consumption of all those individual organisms was many many orders of magnitude more than all of the energy that has been produced by the entirety of humanity.
Re:Are we in an AI Overhang? by dragongod2718 on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @08:59AM (#23975204)
The compute intensive methods are likely to deliver results much faster.

http://incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html