Re:Cloudflare launches Workers Unbound, next evolution of it...
by eastdakota on Monday July 27, 2020 @02:15PM
(#23967811)
We will allow in the future the ability to use larger memory allocations.
Re:Cloudflare launches Workers Unbound, next evolution of it...
by crisscrosscrash on Monday July 27, 2020 @05:26PM
(#23969568)
Any rough guesses on when that could happen? Weeks, months, or next year? Depending on the plans, I'd consider waiting for a Workers-based solution for an upcoming project instead of working on a Cloud Run based deployment.
Re:Cloudflare launches Workers Unbound, next evolution of it...
by alyson-cabral on Monday July 27, 2020 @06:10PM
(#23970014)
Will you sign up for the beta at https://www.cloudflare.com/workers-unbound-beta/ linking to this post? Me or my team will follow-up directly to understand your use case and see if it's a good fit.
Re:Cloudflare launches Workers Unbound, next evolution of it...
by eastdakota on Monday July 27, 2020 @05:46PM
(#23969786)
It’s a configuration change that I believe we can support on a per-user basis today. Encouraged Workers team to follow up here and see if we can get you setup on beta.
Re:Cloudflare launches Workers Unbound, next evolution of it...
by austinpena on Monday July 27, 2020 @06:52PM
(#23970362)
This is a genuine question, why run a database bound application at the edge? Why not just cache HTML on the edge when you can and run the application traditionally?
Re:Cloudflare launches Workers Unbound, next evolution of it...
by thegagne on Monday July 27, 2020 @07:15PM
(#23970503)
Reasons I would want to:
1. To eliminate a layer of application/server/network management (especially if you have complex infra).
2. To get “free” application high availability.
3. To integrate with other stuff on the edge (auth/identity).
4. To serve as a central query aggregator from multiple sources.
Re:Cloudflare launches Workers Unbound, next evolution of it...
by austinpena on Monday July 27, 2020 @10:56PM
(#23971863)
Makes plenty of sense. Thank you!
Are Cloudflare's machine sizes unsuitable for being able to offer more memory as an option?