Sadly we never got that nuclear power plant.
Also, there is no corruption around storing waste because we aren't storing waste yet anywhere outside nuclear facilities which are supervised by the government and the IAEA.
IAEA failed in Iran due to political posturing from europe. Europe has broken more than a few core international organizations. I'd rather not trust them to not cover up anything else for europe.
[1] https://cna.ca/news/germany-replaces-nuclear-coal-ghgs-skyro...
Except they are not. Otherwise Germany wouldn't be one of the dirtiest electricity producers in Europe.
I don't know why EE supporters keep ignoring the fact that any electricity not produced by wind and solar despite being needed will be produced by gas or coal which is why Germany is massively investing into new gas plants and a second gas pipeline to Russia (Nordstream 2).
You cannot solely rely on wind or solar which are intermittent and have a low energy density.
You're correct, that there is not a 1:1 reduction in fossil capacity through the construction of renewable capacity. But the fossil capacity is used less, as the marginal cost of the renewable energy is near zero.
Most pumped hydro today (at least in the US) was built during the nuclear build-out because nuclear can't easily be "load following." So, we had to build out additional infrastructure with low capacity factor.
IMO, tax emissions, let the free market figure it out.