Re:Montreal is taxing churches (2017)
by ThePadawan on Sunday July 26, 2020 @04:37AM
(#23955472)
> AFAIK, the difference would pretty much be that they actually have (pretty loose) limits on what they can spend money on, and on endorsing electoral candidates - and they'd have to publish information about their finances.
I'm not from the US, so I 100% expect those things from churches already. These sound like completely reasonable demands I would have on any public institution.
Re:Montreal is taxing churches (2017)
by lazyasciiart on Sunday July 26, 2020 @04:51AM
(#23955543)
Theoretically churches are already legally forbidden to endorse candidates but in practice this is effectively bypassed with the fiction that priests/pastors/etc can say they are sharing their personal opinion, not an official church position.
https://ffrf.org/outreach/item/14005-churches-and-political-...
If you argued that religion was not an intrinsic social benefit then you might start saying that some of what they do is not non-profit work. That could get interesting.