Re:Doing stupid stuff with GitHub Actions
by gjulianm on Saturday July 25, 2020 @05:05PM
(#23952416)
It's not often that I see things that are stupid but smart at the same time, so cool!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Doing stupid stuff with GitHub Actions
by buzzerbetrayed on Saturday July 25, 2020 @06:47PM
(#23952983)
Genuine question: what is smart about this? What is the reasoning for not just writing the static assets by hand?
The site already existed, but they wanted to serve it statically to save on complexity and money.
If you dig into the repo you'll see that it's maintained using a YAML file, which is a smart way to deal with small sites that still contain structured content.
I do the same thing for my https://github.com/simonw/museums site.
Re:Doing stupid stuff with GitHub Actions
by withinboredom on Saturday July 25, 2020 @06:53PM
(#23953016)
Some possibilities come to mind:
1. because the people writing the content are not developers. 2. there’s dynamic content, but when you know you’re going to get a large influx of traffic from a single region/event, you can precompute it for a short period.