Re:Teaching isn’t about managing behavior
by raxxorrax on Saturday July 25, 2020 @02:17PM
(#23951280)
It think more important than certain paradigms in teaching are actually competent teachers themselves. The optimistic model drew certain crowds. It is an advantage to have a common core in education if is doesn't end in forming people and instead giving them tools.
I think the state has to ensure that education is broadly available and not let people fall behind. But you can only administrate so much to ensure good quality of education.
https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_mosquitos_malaria_and_e...
>12:11
> Once somebody has taught for three years their teaching quality does not change thereafter. The variation is very, very small.
This might not be a bad thing. I remember the late 60's and early 70's being an incredibly innovative time in education: likely when many of the Baby Boomer teachers were stretching their wings.
Experimental schools, "free schools", open classrooms, self-paced learning etc. It was a time when you knew someone that attended a Montessori school, when we were moving to the Metric system...
In short it was a time of optimism and trying out new ideas. If the current crop of teachers can get out from under the yoke of "Common Core" or these other top-down initiatives we might see some innovation in education again.
And frankly school might become fun again as well.