News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hans Reiser leads police to body, believed to be his wife by ojbyrne on Monday July 07, 2008 @10:54PM (#239467)
This sure made me think of the recent "Don't talk to police" thread. I'm not saying he's innocent or anything, and clearly murder is a bad thing (which sounds trite and insensitive), but it just seems like a really bad move on his part. Maybe it got sold to him as saving his own ass, but it seems like it did the opposite. Being convicted is only part of the process - there's appeals, and appeals, and more appeals.

And again, apologies if I sound insensitive. I don't know any of the individuals belonged, and murders are so often in the news that it's easy to discuss them without any real emotion.

Re:Hans Reiser leads police to body, believed to be his wife by mechanical_fish on Monday July 07, 2008 @11:32PM (#239509)
Perhaps the guy really isn't an emotionless robot built entirely of ego -- and, now that his self-defense instinct has exhausted itself, his urge to stop lying, express some entirely authentic and long-suppressed remorse, and save his wife's family and his own children from a lifetime of uncertainty has finally won out.

(For further insight into this aspect of the human psyche I recommend Dostoyevsky's Crime and Punishment.)

Or, perhaps he's an emotionless robot playing the role of a remorseful human being. If so, I think it's about time. It's not as if Plan A was working out well for anyone.

Requiescat in Pace

Re:Hans Reiser leads police to body, believed to be his wife by martey on Tuesday July 08, 2008 @12:17AM (#239559)
He is getting a second-degree conviction instead of first-degree. From the article:

The maximum sentence Reiser could receive for second-degree murder is 15 years to life. Reiser had faced a term of 25 years to life under his first-degree murder conviction.

Considering his sentencing hearing is in a couple of days, I think it makes logical sense.

Re:Hans Reiser leads police to body, believed to be his wife by ojbyrne on Tuesday July 08, 2008 @12:41AM (#239576)
Either I skipped right over those 2 paragraphs, or it wasn't there when I read the article. It says "Updated at 20:11 PDT" Either way my point has been invalidated.