Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by gregmac on Friday July 24, 2020 @02:05PM
(#23942629)
This is like being in a plane at cruising altitude, looking down at the ocean, and declaring there's zero signs of life, so the ocean must be dead.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by pixl97 on Friday July 24, 2020 @03:27PM
(#23943493)
Whales would be visible, along with all the life chemicals, so the analogy isnt that great.
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by jstanley on Friday July 24, 2020 @03:43PM
(#23943648)
I've flown in planes a handful of times, looked down at the ocean on plenty of opportunities, and never observed any whales. I'd say the analogy is perfectly great.
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by Ma8ee on Friday July 24, 2020 @04:14PM
(#23943936)
If the water was as transparent as space, whales and large schools of fish would certainly be apparent.
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by saagarjha on Friday July 24, 2020 @05:22PM
(#23944603)
Space isn't quite transparent, and a closer analogy would be to ask if you can spot bacteria and other microorganisms because something sentient the size of a whale
"scaled up to space" would be unrecognizable as such to us.
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by Ma8ee on Friday July 24, 2020 @05:32PM
(#23944698)
> Space isn't quite transparent
On Earth scale it is for all practical purposes.
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by doctor_eval on Friday July 24, 2020 @08:21PM
(#23945830)
Space whales!
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by gwern on Friday July 24, 2020 @06:02PM
(#23944943)
A rather apt analogy, because you can see countless signs of non-equilibrium behavior, chemicals, heat, and other things (you really have never seen any, say, birds while flying?) that tells you you are not on a planet devoid of life.