News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:More than 1k people at Twitter had ability to aid hack of... by jameshart on Friday July 24, 2020 @10:11AM (#23939714)
GDPR Article 6 spends a lot of time defining ‘necessary’ use. It says that ‘processing data’ - which is defined very broadly and includes accessing it - is only legal if it is for a ‘necessary purpose’ - either necessary to accomplish contracted work for a customer, comply with the law, or some few other permitted categories.

Combined with, as you say, that GDPR also states as a matter of principle data must be “processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of the personal data, including protection against unauthorised or unlawful processing” - I would take that as meaning you can’t just leave data openly accessible to people who don’t need to process it and rely on them not accessing data they don’t need, you are expected to protect the data against that risk. I.e. secure access to data so it can only be processed for necessary purposes.

It is possible for small organizations that ‘telling Janet she isn’t allowed to look in the customer accounts spreadsheet’ is an adequate control but as organizations get bigger obviously the expectation that technical controls should be in place expands.

Re:More than 1k people at Twitter had ability to aid hack of... by AmericanChopper on Saturday July 25, 2020 @11:18PM (#23954162)
Necessary in the context of article 6 refers exclusively to processing that can be performed without consent from the subject. For example:

> processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject