But 2020 is technically the start of a decade, not just informally.
ISO 8601 defines what a 'decade' is.
I mean you're free to ignore it of course, like you're free to say March has 34 days if you want... but you may have trouble communicating with people and integrating with existing systems.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decade
> A decade is a period of 10 years.
Which explains why it is so difficult to make a reservation at Milliways.
This isn't the standard technical meaning of 'decade'.
This whole article and thread is about building technical systems for dates.
In a technical context, 'decade' is a term with a specific standard meaning, which is that it starts on a year ending with a zero.
It's not nerd sniping to point that out in a thread already all about giving dates precise technical meanings!
The thread is nothing but nerd sniping.
There is no technical context for time defining “decades” that is anything other than nominal.
The fact that people are so hung up on this detail is itself evidence that it has no concrete philosophical foundation. Any definition you care to toss around is arbitrary.
It is pure bikeshed, and this is what gives the article its glimmer of truth that validates the satire.
ISO
To save others time, here's the ISO-8601 document which is apparently being referenced: https://dgn.isolutions.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:8601:-1:ed...
"decade" is defined in 3.1.2.22:
decade time scale unit (3.1.1.7) of 10 calendar years (3.1.2.21), beginning with a year whose year number is divisible without remainder by ten Note 1 to entry: Decade is also used to refer to an arbitrary duration (3.1.1.8) of 10 years, however decade is not used as such in this document.
Yes, yes, all of the adjectival disclaimers were used to try to align the discussion directly to how words are used "in [that] document." While the document is highly important, there are many technical contexts in which it is completely appropriate to talk about decades without the slightest consideration of how the same term might be used therein.
<rant> I'm annoyed by this argument, which came up again at the start of this year in dumb Twitter discussions about whether 2020 marks the beginning of a new decade.
2000 was not the final year of the Nineties. 2000 was the final year of the second millennium, and of the 20th century, and of the tenth decade of the 20th century. The Nineties were the years 1990-1999, the tenth decade of the 20th century were the years 1991-2000. These are different ranges, but we also use different terms to refer to them. There is no logical problem. There is only a problem with the assumption that these different terms "should" refer to the same concept.
So did 2020 mark the beginning of a new decade? Yes, it marked the beginning of the decade we might call the Twenty-Twenties. It did not mark the beginning of the third decade of the 21st century; that will be 2021. </rant>