Re:Pothead Ph.D. - This is most definitely not a cautionary ...
by rms on Monday July 07, 2008 @09:11PM
(#239408)
>I challenged the appropriateness of a #1 hn post from a student who uses drugs to get by and then brags about it.
It would have been more meaningful if he was a physics or science PhD. A pot smoking liberal arts PhD is... eh. Not news.
Re:Pothead Ph.D. - This is most definitely not a cautionary ...
by edw519 on Tuesday July 08, 2008 @10:19AM
(#239864)
A pot smoking liberal arts PhD is... eh. Not news.
Right. Until some voted it up to #1 here.
Re:Pothead Ph.D. - This is most definitely not a cautionary ...
by DanielBMarkham on Monday July 07, 2008 @07:17PM
(#239302)
You're welcome : )
I voted you up just based on all the crowd-voting going on.
Sorry about misrepresenting your post. It had been a while since you posted it, and it's gone now.
he just questioned the morality of pot as an aide in student studies
No I didn't.
I challenged the appropriateness of a #1 hn post from a student who uses drugs to get by and then brags about it.
The reaction seems very mob-like.
I didn't know what to expect, but this was no surprise. Since "net" scores are the only thing that show, I'm curious how many up votes and down votes there were. Even though the net is negative, I wonder how many people agreed.