News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple releases study defending App Store's 30% cut ahead ... by AnthonyMouse on Wednesday July 22, 2020 @06:39PM (#23922343)
You don't get any increase in margins for porting to iOS if the percentage changes for the Play Store because you can't sell to iOS customers via the Play Store.
Re:Apple releases study defending App Store's 30% cut ahead ... by hinkley on Thursday July 23, 2020 @03:13AM (#23924921)
You started with “most relevantly” and my initial reaction to this follow up is “how is that relevant at all”?

The costs of porting are relevant to value of the new audience. The value to the old audience is negative (what are we losing while they are focused in something else). The value to the team is complicated, has to be weighed, and big changes like new APIs or new revenue structures tip that balance.

Re:Apple releases study defending App Store's 30% cut ahead ... by AnthonyMouse on Thursday July 23, 2020 @05:21AM (#23925575)
> You started with “most relevantly” and my initial reaction to this follow up is “how is that relevant at all”?

It's relevant to whether the rates are based on competition, or to put it the other way, whether competition affects the rate they can charge.

If Google charged a lower rate, would it change the calculation for porting to iOS, so that Apple might have to lower their rate too? No, because you can't reach iOS customers via Google Play, so if you want to sell to them you still have to pay whatever Apple demands:

> If iOS was profitable before it still is, if it wasn't it still isn't.