Highly automated digital audio workstation extensible in Guile

Re:Highly automated digital audio workstation extensible in ... by megameter on Tuesday July 21, 2020 @06:03PM (#23911470)

My half-remembered experience of Ardour from some years back was that it felt very fleshed out in replicating traditional recording, but had little in terms of sequencing. As such it was "wonderful product, just not for me". And I'm happy to hear that you are sticking with it.

I have basically stuck with OpenMPT after all this time, since most of the time I want to really sequence something on the grid, and only deviate from that if really necessary(and then usually turn to Mixcraft which has a decent set of defaults and built-in plugins and presets for most things).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Highly automated digital audio workstation extensible in ... by PaulDavisThe1st on Tuesday July 21, 2020 @06:28PM (#23911663)

Yeah, Ardour definitely started life as linear/timeline recording tool, along the lines of (then) ProTools/Samplitude/Pyramix/Sequoia.

Ableton Live changed everything, even for the sequencer-originated DAWs like Cubase, and it's true that in Ardour we haven't (yet) attempted to tackle that sort of thing.

Stay tuned though!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Highly automated digital audio workstation extensible in ... by grawprog on Tuesday July 21, 2020 @08:43PM (#23912654)

Personally I prefer the lack of a sequencer in ardour. I use muse or rosegarden for most midi tracks and hydrogen for drums. I feel like this fits more with the modular linux philosophy, though I do realize ardour is cross platform. I appreciate that ardour has pretty much one paradigm and does it well.

[ Parent | on HN ]