News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kevin Ham - "the man who owns the internet" (long) by schmoe on Tuesday May 22, 2007 @02:09PM (#23910)
What a great example of Hannah Arendt's "the banality of evil". Since the domain market is unregulated why not take advantage of that for your own personal gain, regardless of who it harms? After all everyone else is too right? Buy up all the names you can and fill them with worthless advertising instead of useful content. How disgusting!
Re:Kevin Ham - "the man who owns the internet" (long) by byrneseyeview on Tuesday May 22, 2007 @02:13PM (#23911)
How disgusting, indeed?

It's for sale, nobody owns it, and it's eventually going to be controlled by whoever can use it best. I suspect that you aren't hurting for content, given that there's already more than anyone could possibly absorb.

Re:Kevin Ham - "the man who owns the internet" (long) by lupin_sansei on Tuesday May 22, 2007 @11:36PM (#23986)
The alternative is how Australia's commercial domain names are issued. You must have a registered business name in Australia before you can get mycompany.com.au. I'd rather the easy simple .com method any day.
Re:Kevin Ham - "the man who owns the internet" (long) by lupin_sansei on Tuesday May 22, 2007 @11:37PM (#23987)
Also what's with the devaluing of the word evil lately? We should save evil for the Holocaust, the Gulag's etc. Not waste it on business methods that are just low/tacky.