News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Urban Decay: Exploring an old abandoned particle collider... by rdl on Thursday March 31, 2011 @03:05AM (#2390666)
When the SSC was cancelled, I decided I never wanted to be a scientist (I was 15 or so); it would be so horrible to work on a program like this and be entirely dependent upon the government for funding, then have it killed. Entrepreneurship seems much more incremental; if you raise 50% as much money, you can still often do things, just with more risk and pain; if you have a big grant funded science project, 50% in getting it funded gets you very little more than 0% success.
Re:Urban Decay: Exploring an old abandoned particle collider... by rhaygood on Thursday March 31, 2011 @03:19AM (#2390696)
The death of the SSC kept me out of particle physics. I was thinking of becoming a theoretical particle physicist, but I'm skeptical of doing theory without frequent input from experiments - it may be mathematically elegant, but it may well not be physics. I eventually went into biology, where there's more data of some kinds than we know what to do with, albeit other kinds of data we'd like are still hard to come by.
Re:Urban Decay: Exploring an old abandoned particle collider... by perlgeek on Thursday March 31, 2011 @04:31AM (#2390802)
> but I'm skeptical of doing theory without frequent input from experiments - it may be mathematically elegant, but it may well not be physics.

Sad that you didn't chose the path of science - we need more people with that healthy scepticism.

Re:Urban Decay: Exploring an old abandoned particle collider... by tzs on Thursday March 31, 2011 @11:58AM (#2392083)
Biology is not science?