Re:The chemfp project: problems selling free software
by EvanAnderson on Tuesday July 21, 2020 @05:14AM
(#23905443)
That's basically my thesis. Even entertainment software, which is, I think, the most amenable category to being a "product" is going the way of subscription services.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The chemfp project: problems selling free software
by dalke on Tuesday July 21, 2020 @05:37AM
(#23905546)
I commented in the parallel thread at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23905523 . Basically, commercial scientific software has long had a software product model based on yearly support/upgrades, scientific software has a long history where even decades-old code bases are useful, and pharmaceutical research has a practice of doing their database searches and research in-house, in order to protect trade secrets.
So I think scientific software is more amenable to this sort of product+support model than you do.
Or rather, what I think of as a product sale includes a support contract or occasional re-purchase at full price, rather than a pure fire-and-forget model like embedded software.