News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Any claim without a URI should be treated as suspicious by dane-pgp on Monday July 20, 2020 @01:10PM (#23899838)
> I've seen that here on HN, too.

Oh yeah? Give us an example then.

Re:Any claim without a URI should be treated as suspicious by agustif on Monday July 20, 2020 @01:11PM (#23899843)
Re:Any claim without a URI should be treated as suspicious by dane-pgp on Monday July 20, 2020 @01:31PM (#23900028)
Thank you. ;) That was the response I was hoping for.
Re:Any claim without a URI should be treated as suspicious by sixstringtheory on Monday July 20, 2020 @02:33PM (#23900554)
It occurs to me, though, that many people may not even click that link, or its content might disappear* one day, and its mere existence in the conversation might let readers assign more weight to the argument.

* Thanks to the good folks at Internet Archive for working this problem.

Re:Any claim without a URI should be treated as suspicious by agustif on Monday July 20, 2020 @01:34PM (#23900052)
Hahaha no problem, I almost restrain myself from it so dang or other mods wouldn't think it's pointless. But couldn't help myself and is something I see in HN sometimes, like it's own internal meme... hahaha