Even Ceph has its warts for distributed object storage as does basically... anything in existence worth considering that's OSS-ish (GlusterFS, HDFS, Lustre) but comparing Minio to ZFS is confusing given how drastically different in purpose, functionality, and engineering hardening has happened between the two projects. With that said, the AWS S3 team really is impressive in what they've built out and deserves more shout-outs from people outside Amazon.
However, I'm slightly concerned that we haven't tested it enough, and that doc and support may prove to be lacking (like in your case) when we hit edge cases and failure scenarios.
No LTS version. Bugs will be fixed in a new version, which may include new bugs. Some upgrades need full cluster restart. If you ask too many question you may get "it's better start a subscription".
Minio is barely documented. I had to ask in Slack to interpret what it meant when minio said "your cluster is 5 red and 7 yellow" as the colours aren't event documented.
Every minio cluster I hosted had dataloss. Each one has lead to a reported issue on their GitHub that hasn't been closed to date. Nothing about recovery is documented. Documentation is slim in general. Really confused why you're naming it next to ZFS which is sublimely documented and withstood the test of time.
I'd advise something battletested through time like Ceph for object storage instead.