Re:Bohr–van Leeuwen theorem – magnetism in solids is a quant...
by tazedsoul on Sunday July 19, 2020 @05:48PM
(#23892734)
I think the lesson of Feynman’s rant has eluded you. I’d keep studying it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bohr–van Leeuwen theorem – magnetism in solids is a quant...
by axaxs on Sunday July 19, 2020 @06:05PM
(#23892840)
I learned the lesson of explanations going into a 'why?' rabbit hole 2 years ago. It was taught to me by my then 6 year old daughter.
Re:Bohr–van Leeuwen theorem – magnetism in solids is a quant...
by tazedsoul on Sunday July 19, 2020 @11:29PM
(#23894430)
That isn’t the lesson.
Re:Bohr–van Leeuwen theorem – magnetism in solids is a quant...
by axaxs on Monday July 20, 2020 @12:58AM
(#23894763)
If a watcher doesn't understand the lesson, was it a good session? As an acolyte, why not enlighten us? Or should I just keep watching a condescending asshole avoid a question until I understand something that makes you happy?
Re:Bohr–van Leeuwen theorem – magnetism in solids is a quant...
by thelightthat on Monday July 20, 2020 @05:07AM
(#23896081)
What is the lesson?