News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why companies lose their best innovators (2019) by MattGaiser on Sunday July 19, 2020 @12:01AM (#23886894)
Cisco shareholders lost as they should have had the value of Zoom as part of their existing shares. The loss is in having to buy it separately.
Re:Why companies lose their best innovators (2019) by konschubert on Sunday July 19, 2020 @05:00AM (#23888015)
The problem only occurs if the assumption of inventing zoom was priced into the cisco stock. If Cisco is priced at a multiple of earnings then shareholders get a totally fine deal and can invest their leftover money into startups.
Re:Why companies lose their best innovators (2019) by quicklime on Sunday July 19, 2020 @03:55AM (#23887782)
It’s not just that. Cisco shareholders lost as they should have had the value of webex as part of their existing shares. This is being lost as zoom takes over.
Re:Why companies lose their best innovators (2019) by roenxi on Sunday July 19, 2020 @12:08AM (#23886922)
I'd have made more money buying Zoom at IPO than I would if I held Cisco at the same time but added Zoom to Cisco's market cap. There was a big opportunity here for investors.

Sure Cisco shareholders would have been better off if Zoom was an in-house project, but investors are really the ones who are supposed to be making the value calls on teleconference-or-routers market exposure style decisions. If I'm a Cisco shareholder I don't think management made a mistake. I think I made a mistake not becoming a Zoom shareholder.

Re:Why companies lose their best innovators (2019) by aidanlister on Sunday July 19, 2020 @01:09AM (#23887164)
Okay, you both made a mistake then. Your mistake does not lessen Cisco’s mistake.