Re:Amazon soya and beef exports 'linked to deforestation'
by afandian on Saturday July 18, 2020 @07:20AM
(#23880610)
This is exactly what I mean. The immediate response is often one of dismissal, and it takes quite a lot of effort to move beyond it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon soya and beef exports 'linked to deforestation'
by bzb3 on Saturday July 18, 2020 @07:52AM
(#23880759)
Would you say what of any other political position? Probably not.
Re:Amazon soya and beef exports 'linked to deforestation'
by afandian on Saturday July 18, 2020 @10:20AM
(#23881545)
Not sure what you're trying to say.
But IMHO any belief is worth challenging. 'Bad' beliefs should be pushed back on, 'good' beliefs should stand more than surface leven scrutiny.
Re:Amazon soya and beef exports 'linked to deforestation'
by maallooc on Saturday July 18, 2020 @07:22AM
(#23880623)
Why move beyond? I've just had 350g of juicy flat iron steak, produced 7 kilos of co2 and happy about it.
Don't try to boss people around because I'm not buying. Thanks to people like you, I can finally enjoy beef without guilt. Keep up the good work.
Re:Amazon soya and beef exports 'linked to deforestation'
by afandian on Saturday July 18, 2020 @07:30AM
(#23880667)
I simply invited you to ask yourself a question, and suggested that the initial response can be a useful thing to engage with, rather than a hard stopping point. Like I said, an experiment.