News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hackers tell the story of the Twitter attack from the inside by BLKNSLVR on Friday July 17, 2020 @08:03PM (#23877537)
Did NYT follow through with revealing the real name of the Slate Star Codex author?

That's one data point in opposition (although not exactly revealing a 'source', the difference is splitting hairs).

Re:Hackers tell the story of the Twitter attack from the inside by austhrow743 on Friday July 17, 2020 @08:37PM (#23877805)
The difference really isn't splitting hairs. Not only is he not a source, he's not anonymous.

Blogged under his full name until a couple years ago, blogs under first and middle still, full name still all over the internet and discoverable within a couple minutes, details of life all over blog still. Hell you probably don't even need to know his last name to find him. Scott Alexander Bay Area Psychiatrist is probably enough to go trawling through psychiatrist practice staff pages and find him fairly quickly.

Dude's basically wishing he was anonymous and living in denial because to accept that he isn't would be to accept that he really shouldn't continue his career and blog.

I think it's entirely possible for a person to both be willing to publish his last name and also go to prison in order to protect a source, all while remaining consistent in their principles.

Re:Hackers tell the story of the Twitter attack from the inside by gallabytes on Saturday July 18, 2020 @04:56AM (#23880074)
the real issue is what you get when you google Scott [Lastname]. If the top result is an NYT story his patients will reliably find it, and that can be problems.