News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The evidence which suggests that Covid-19 is not a natura... by Robotbeat on Friday July 17, 2020 @07:27PM (#23877241)
I don’t agree. Political, overconfident language is not scientifically appropriate, especially for a paper purporting to overturn the scientific consensus.

Sounds like this is language that was in there before peer review but that was removed before publication. Makes sense that part didn’t pass peer review as it’s improper to make such overconfident conclusions and claims in a scientific paper.

Re:The evidence which suggests that Covid-19 is not a natura... by bnjms on Tuesday July 21, 2020 @12:05AM (#23904257)
You've won me over. This type of language belongs in accompanying text not directly in a scientific paper.