DNS is far less of a single point of failure and more decentralized than cloudflare. Nameservers can and are operated redundantly via simple, resolver-side round-robin scheduling and the TLD servers should have longer TTLs that allow plenty of caching. The rootzone even has anycast thanks to using UDP. Take a moment to look at DoH and laugh.
You can also also register your domain on multiple TLDs.
DNS worked just fine throughout this. You're barking up the wrong tree.
https://handshake.org is pretty interesting.
The "decentralized internet" folks always talk a lot about fighting corporate control. I think they should spend more time talking about resiliency and blast-radius reduction.
Re:Cloudflare was down
by ghastmaster on Friday July 17, 2020 @05:46PM
(#23876247)
I just recently ran across this. I wonder how much performance would be degraded.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7530014/authors#authors
> Unlike previous DNS replacement proposals, D 3 NS is reverse compatible with DNS and allows for incremental implementation within the current system.
DNS is decentralized, it's just not when everyone goes with one big service.
Re:Cloudflare was down
by remmargorp64 on Monday July 20, 2020 @04:38PM
(#23901641)
It might be decentralized, but how do you actually get a .com domain name without going through some kind of corporate gatekeeping or paying a fee?
Re:Cloudflare was down
by tenebrisalietum on Friday July 17, 2020 @06:44PM
(#23876865)
I'm down for passing around a GPG signed hosts2.txt file. Let's get started.
We REALLY need a truly decentralized, distributed DNS system that is not owned by private entities.