Re: B-Trees - Balanced Search Trees for Slow Storage
by noodle on Monday July 07, 2008 @11:53AM
(#238725)
yes, i know. my point is, try finding an entry-level position that requires knowledge and experience of b-trees and not hashtables.
Re: B-Trees - Balanced Search Trees for Slow Storage
by cdr on Monday July 07, 2008 @12:33PM
(#238776)
Like a lot of things, it's good to know for the interview but most likely useless after that.
Re: B-Trees - Balanced Search Trees for Slow Storage
by lampy on Monday July 07, 2008 @12:39PM
(#238780)
Try finding a senior-level engineering position that doesn't require knowledge of B-trees or similar computer science topics.
Re: B-Trees - Balanced Search Trees for Slow Storage
by Tamerlin on Monday July 07, 2008 @12:47PM
(#238792)
So far in my experience the companies hiring want you to know that sort of thing, but that knowledge is largely wasted at most jobs.
Re: B-Trees - Balanced Search Trees for Slow Storage
by Tamerlin on Monday July 07, 2008 @12:46PM
(#238790)
Knowing what a binary tree is turned out to be overkill for even most of the senior developer positions I've had.
Re: B-Trees - Balanced Search Trees for Slow Storage
by dfranke on Monday July 07, 2008 @03:45PM
(#239100)
Hash tables can be used on disk as well.
But they're not useful for the same purpose as a hash table, which is also a pervasive data structure, but for a different problem area: constant time access to in-memory data.