News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who’s behind Wednesday’s epic Twitter hack? by phs318u on Friday July 17, 2020 @12:46AM (#23867144)
Agreed but I said "apart from scale and reach". The point I was trying to make was that people have always found it fairly easy to believe non-credible sources. In this sense, social media is not qualitatively different. Only quantitatively different.
Re:Who’s behind Wednesday’s epic Twitter hack? by ergl on Friday July 17, 2020 @06:23AM (#23869069)
A large quantitative change is indistinguishable from a qualitative change: what's the difference between light rain and a flood, between some small waves and a tsunami?
Re:Who’s behind Wednesday’s epic Twitter hack? by phs318u on Saturday July 18, 2020 @02:56AM (#23879608)
What I meant, is that in the eyes/ears of those RECEIVING the information (and believing it uncritically), there's no difference. People have always had a predisposition to uncritically accepting information from those "in the tribe", whether that be extended family, or an internet echo chamber. Presumably this was a survival optimisation. Trust those "close", and distrust "others".